Bigg Boss 11 – FIR filed against Priyank Sharma and Sapna Chaudhary and Colours TV for abusing Arshi by going personal matter about sex racket in Pune.
Priyank Sharma’s re-entry into the Bigg Boss house seems to be making a massive storm in multiple way. Even though Bigg Boss had given Priyank strict instructions to no longer point out something that occurred in the Bigg Boss house, appears like Priyank did not take the trace.
The Bigg Boss 11 has gotten right into a legal concern now and the one who has kept the basis for this crisis is none rather then Priyank Sharma.
Priyank joined Hina’s workforce after his re-entry:
Priyank simply re-entered the condominium and before he would have celebrated his return, he acquired embroiled in a authorized problem. It used to be as a rule noticeable that he has come this time with full coaching to play the game and he joined the workforce of Hina Khan.
The previous day, when the battle took situation, Priyank brought up the topic of Pune-Goa scandal in which Arshi is said to be worried. As per studies, Arshi used to be a part of the sex rackets operating in Pune and Goa and police came to learn about it when an agent Vipul Dahal used to be arrested through them. Arshi was also caught in a lodge in Goa but she saved herself with the aid of convincing the police about her non-involvement and took a flight to Mumbai.
In the day gone by’s episode, when Arshi and Sapna have been combating, Priyank requested Sapna to say the words Pune and Goa (relating to Arshi’s ancient police case), to rile up Arshi. And this transfer backfired in opposition to both Priyank and Sapna as an F.I.R has been filed towards them.
The contents of the F.I.R, as released via Arshi Khan’s publicist Flynn Remedios is as follows –
“submitting FIR/criminal criticism against Bigg Boss eleven contestants, Priyank Sharma, Sapna Choudhary, colors, Endemol, in these days underneath quite a lot of IPC provisions involving the glory of a girl in legally privileged and covered instances. Colors and Endemol are accused/responsible of allowing telecast of legally privileged/covered and subjudice court concerns including the proper to hinder or avoid self-incrimination by using accused or victim woman and utilizing it for TRP and economic gain.”
We too agree that personal attacks are usually not excellent when you’re in public’s eye and Sapna will have to additionally try to preserve manage on her anger.
What do you have to say in this regard?